Dynamically changing coefficients of sports events
Line change betting odds
Computer program "KoefficientyRU". Perhaps this is exactly what you have always been looking for
Testing the game "Above 7 Under"
The essence of the game is simple - two dice are thrown and the outcome of the bet is determined by their amount. Only three types of bets:
1) "The sum is less than seven", the coefficient is approximately 2.3;
2) "Seven", the coefficient is approximately 5.8;
3) "The amount is more than seven", the coefficient is approximately 2.3.
We will test each type of bet separately (individually) for a long distance. Initial conditions: money 1000 units, we make 1000 rates, the program randomly generate numbers on cubes. For this we use the program «KoefficientyRU»,
In the tab "Testing games" we choose the game in question. This tab is available even in the tested (free) version of the program. The appearance of the window for testing this game:
I will add some explanations of the figures that are not quite clear in the register of all bets in the upper right corner of the program.
I analyze only the first line:
1 - Bid number
10,00 - Bet amount
5+2=7 - Non-randomly generated numbers and their sum
+48,00 - Profit/Loss of this rate
0(0) - The number of losses in a row (in brackets, the maximum number of losses in a row)
1 - Current number of wins
1 048,00 - Current balance
So, I'm testing the bet "Over" five times in a row. With individual testing, absolutely all bets are equal to 1 unit.
I'm testing the bet "7" five times in a row. When you individually test the strategy "7", absolutely all bets are equal to the value of the "Initial bet" of 7 "> in the" <7 "Dogon> field.
Here are such disappointing (Rate "7" on the 4th chart showed a good profitability.This is more likely to happen by chance than naturally), but we will get logical results for each type of bets and it is not surprising,
But otherwise, why should the bookmakers give you their money.
And yet, by combining the types of rates and sums of bets, let's try the yield in this game to win over to our side. 100% yield does not bring not one investment in the world, everywhere there is a risk of losing your investments,
But you can increase the probability of profit making everywhere. So here, be prepared for the inevitable losses, but, as the big specialists say, if all the rules are observed, these losses will be recoverable.
So, the first step to improving profitability. We only bet on the outcome of "7" and at each loss increase the next bet by 20%, if you win, we return to the original bet size and start all over again.
But when do you stop and start all over again, if there are constant losses? This can be established experimentally, the program has the ability to change the maximum number of losses.
And so we test the "7 Dogon" with the maximum number of losses in a row equal to seven.
The results of the experiment show that the volatility of the deposit has greatly increased, but together with it the risks of losses also increased. If you take a closer look at the results, the first thing you want to change in them,
It's not even the total number of losses, and the number of losing streaks.
We are taking the next step to improving the profitability of your strategy - we are trying to reduce the number of consecutive results not equal to "7". We play a minimum bet in the game "Under" or "Above" until we drop out seven (it will be possible to select another value experimentally) times not "7".
As the very first testing shows, this is a losing strategy, but since our goal is completely different now, the minimum bet will bring a minimal, even microscopic, loss at this stage of the game. And now, when the cubes have not given out "7" for the necessary number of times in a row,
Go to the rate of "7" and do all that is described in the previous step of the game in "7 Dispense".
Additional setup of the game: as I already described above, the bet on the strategy "Under" or "Above" is minimal, but what is the initial bet to make on the game "7"? This can also be calculated experimentally. It is quite obvious that it should be several times larger than the minimum
The rate on the strategy "Under"/"Above", and its maximum value is limited only by the amount of loss that you are willing to survive. Here are the results in this case:
Almost horizontal sections of the size of the deposit are clearly visible on the chart - this is the situation when we bet on the minimum deposit (1 unit) on the "Pod" or "Above" strategy. These rates on a minimum deposit in the calculation (Won / Lost) do not take, so there are so few Wins,
But I take this into consideration only at rates "7".
Here I have resulted only one profitability graph, and they turn out a great variety, experiment yourself, and the conclusions are all the more done by yourself.